Monday, March 9, 2015

Nine Reasons Why You Must Improve the Environmental Performance of Your Business

article by Dr Graeme Codrington

Environmental sustainability should be at the heart of strategy and business objectives, and not treated simply as corporate social responsibility.

Image result for going green
"Going green" is often seen as a "nice to have" policy for companies – something to allocate a small group of well meaning lower level staff members. This is short sighted, and ignores some very significant strategic reasons to improve your company's environmental performance. This is one of the easiest and most powerful ways to increase your business and differentiate for your company, while improving bottom line performance.

Yet many businesses continue to ignore these issues, relegating it to a low priority task team. This is short sighted and potentially damaging.

There are significant advantages for the companies that take energy efficiency and business sustainability seriously. You don't have to be a do-gooder to develop processes and systems to improve the environmental performance of your business.

Here are nine reasons why you should take these issues seriously, and see business improvement as a result. Doing well by doing good is possible. And desirable!

1. You are wasting money
Energy, water, materials and resources all cost money. Most companies use more of these resources than they actually need to. Our problem is that most of your staff have grown up in a world where energy, water and other resources (supplied by "utility" companies) have not been managed as a habit or lifestyle. We grew up just expecting lights to burn and water to run, and not really counting the cost of this. That has changed, of course. Our children are very aware of the cost of the use of these resources – not just the monetary cost, but also the cost to the planet. But that generation is not yet working for you in significant numbers.

It's no surprise then that we use unnecessary energy and resources. The good news is that most companies can easily and quickly reduce this usage. And this will result in immediate savings, reduction of costs and therefore increased profit. Savings from reducing waste (whether that is wasted materials, resources, water or energy) go straight to your bottom line. If your profit margin is 25%, every £1 saved in this way is equivalent to £4 worth of new sales. During the recession, when every penny counts, this must be worth considering. And unlike reducing staff, reductions in waste costs improve rather than detract from your ability to deliver value to your customers.

Image result for going green
There are four simple steps to reducing your costs. You must start by measuring your usage. You can improve what you can measure. You must then empower your people to make adjustments to systems and behaviour. Thirdly, you might need to make some physical changes and upgrades to your facilities. This need not scare you – there are ways to do this whereby a return on investment within a few months is guaranteed. Finally, you need to report on what you have done, communicating to all stakeholders.

Of course, there is some complexity in each of these steps. But the principle is simple, the execution can be easy, and the results are immediate. Stop wasting money, and start reducing your resource usage now.

2. Your energy, water and waste management costs are rising
Energy costs have more than doubled in the past two years. Waste management costs continue to rise as landfill tax escalates and the type of materials that can be landfilled is increasingly restricted. Water resources are becoming more and more scarce, especially in densely populated regions of the world, leading to rising costs. These costs will not be reduced in the years ahead. In fact, they will increase in price exponentially, as both the underlying costs increase due to shortage of supply and government imposes further taxes on their usage. Doing nothing on environment performance means going backwards rather than standing still.

3. Your compliance costs are rising and you could end up in court
The UK is one of the first major economies to pass a Climate Change Act. The Act was promulgated by Parliament in December 2008, and is now being followed by a raft of policies and programmes to ensure it is implemented and adhered to. The same will happen in economies around the world. President Obama has promised to do something similar within his first term, and Prime Minister Rudd has been doing so in Australia since he came to power. There are literally hundreds of pieces of environmental legislation being drafted around the world. Most companies have not begun to fully understand the implications of this trend for their businesses over the next decade.

In addition to legislation, regulators such as the US Environment Agency are increasingly taking a risk-based approach to enforcement. If, for example, your company routinely stores hazardous materials, or you are regarded as having poor environmental practices, you will be targeted for inspections and audits. This will be time consuming, disrupt your activities, and could end up in fines, court action and even closure of your business.

Your response over the next few years could be to continually shift in an incremental fashion, to keep just ahead of the law. But this is an expensive hobby. Eradicating problems completely is much cheaper in the long run and will keep you miles ahead of the lawmakers. Maybe more importantly, it will also potentially keep you miles ahead of your competitors, and allow you the luxury of calling for greater regulation in your industry, thus putting more pressure on your competition.

4. You can reduce your risk (and increase access to capital)
When this recession is over, a new landscape of credit and risk management will have emerged. We are not going to go back to how things were. Probably the greatest change will be access to funding and credit. Simply put, your access to capital is dependent on your future prospects and your risk profile. The lower the risk, the more funds you'll have access to and the cheaper your credit will be. It really does work like that.
Increasingly, before the recession, savvy investors were using environmental records as a proxy for good management and hidden value. After the recession, they will increasingly analyse your environmental record for signs of risk. Given the legislation in the pipeline, and the public's demand for ethical behaviour and environmental excellence, your record on environmental issues will be hugely significant to potential investors and creditors. Now is the time to develop your reputation in this area.

In addition to access to cheaper capital, lower risks also mean cheaper insurance. Since climate related insurance claims have increased exponentially over the past decade, the ability to demonstrate that your business is future-proofing itself against these types of risks will have a significant effect on premiums payable.

5. Your customers or clients demand it
If you sell to the public, certain markets are going solidly "green". A new generation of ethically aware consumers is demanding that your products and services meet certain standards in this regard. And they are becoming increasingly educated on what questions to ask, and where to look for the answers to their questions. The proportion of white goods rated "A" for energy efficiency has risen from none to 76% in the ten years to 2006. The same trend is evident in many sectors and products lines.

Image result for going green
If you sell to other businesses, then your environmental performance becomes their environmental performance. Increasingly larger organisations are demanding information on suppliers' performance and Local Authorities, the NHS and other public sector bodies are turning to "green procurement" to meet Government targets. In February 2009, for example, the UK's National Health Service issued a policy document entitled, "Reducing Carbon, Improving Healthcare". This document highlighted the role of suppliers in the NHS's carbon footprint, and mandated NHS facilities to put significant pressure on its suppliers to reduce energy use over the next 5 years. The NHS employs 1.3 million people (5% of the UK workforce) and is the largest employer in Europe. The pressure on suppliers will be significant, and your ability to compete for NHS work may be hampered or helped by your environmental record.

6. Your competitors are doing it
Given what we've said so far, this point should be fairly obvious. The issue of environmental policies is more and more going to be a competitive advantage opportunity. You don't want to be the last company in your industry to understand this. And, in a world where every competitive advantage is temporary anyway, it would be a pity for you to miss such an obvious and easy opportunity to take a lead in your industry right now.

Some sectors are already slugging it out in this space. Retailers in the UK, for example, are fighting each other to become carbon neutral and demonstrate energy usage reductions. It might be argued that a lot of what they are doing has more to do with public perception and green image than reality. That will ultimately trip some of them up, but for now none of the big retail chains can afford to ignore this issue.

But it isn't all about image. If your competitors have a better environmental performance than you, they will also have lower operating costs, higher profit margins and opportunities to be more competitive on pricing strategy. They will be more robust and able to adapt to future legislation, lower risk, avoid environmental taxation and respond more effectively to ethical consumer demand, with much better PR and marketing opportunities. It's also been proven that companies with good environmental policies have better motivated employees and are able to attract the best new recruits. When you put it that way, you'd be mad not to do this.

7. Your staff want you to do it
An increasing number of graduate recruits are stating that the environmental policies and ethical image of potential employers is "very important" in their decision making process. In the "war for talent" that companies of all sizes have to fight, environmental issues can be a deciding factor.

This has been confirmed in the UK by both the Association of Graduate Recruiters (AGR) and the Chartered Institute for Personnel and Development (CIPD). In the US, a survey of over 4,000 people carried out by recruitment job site MonsterTRAK found that 80% of young professionals are interested in securing a job that has a positive impact on the environment. And over 90% claimed they would prefer to work for an environmentally friendly employer. In the UK, a survey of 5,000 job hunters showed that 43% would not work for a firm which had no ethical or environmental policies, even if they were offered £10,000 a year more than to work for a business with a sense of corporate social responsibility. This was confirmed in a global survey of graduates by PriceWaterhouseCoopers, "Millennials at Work", which found that 88% of young staff wanted an employer whose CSR values matched their own. 58% of employees specifically indicated that they wanted their employer's policy on climate change to match their own.

This is not only a recruitment issue. Employees are much more likely to be engaged in a company that makes a positive contribution to the environment. The media coverage and goodwill generated will also serve to motivate staff and engender a sense of pride in their work and association with an environmentally progressive organisation.

8. They're watching you – activists will not leave you alone
In 2007, Apple Computers was one of the world's most admired companies, with a remarkable image and stylish products. That was until Greenpeace put them at the bottom of an environmental league table of electronics companies and set up a parody of Apple's website to detail their environmental infractions. Apple's CEO, Steve Jobs, at first dismissed the campaign, but this only instigated a stronger backlash. It then became clear that Apple's image could be very quickly tarnished, and the company did a swift u-turn. Jobs personally launched and oversaw a radical programme to improve environmental performance. This was publicised on the company's home page for a month. It cost a lot, disrupted plans and was reactionary. But Apple will feel the benefits for years to come.

Image result for going green
The message is clear. You can wait until you are forced to become green, or you can choose to do so at your own pace and on your terms. But, ultimately, you will have to go green. And if the activists do get hold of you, they can destroy years of brand building in an instant.

The higher profile your business, the more likely you will be targeted by activists. These groups need high profile campaigns, like Apple, Gap, Primark, Nike and others, to make the mainstream media take notice. If you are a smaller business, but you do business with a high profile client, then pressure groups will hold them responsible for your environmental sins. This is a very easy way to lose a major customer.

The positive side of this issue is that the media is very hungry for "green" stories at the moment. By embarking on energy saving strategies and becoming environmentally progressive, you will make it a lot easier to get PR and media coverage. And some of that exposure cannot be bought with money.

9. Just because you can
Of course, ethical consumption is more than just a new consumer fad. It is not just this season's "in-thing". The reason that people are becoming ethical consumers is because they understand, even if only instinctively, that we are over utilizing - in many cases, even abusing - the planet's resources. We know that this cannot be sustained, and we know that we have to do something about it. We can no longer claim ignorance about issues like global warming, devastation of natural environments, abuse of workers and the like.

There are good business reasons to do something now. We can no longer claim ignorance about issues like global warming, devastation of natural environments. There are compelling moral reasons, too. Whether or not you're convinced by science or media reports on global warming, there is no doubt that our planet is under duress at the moment. The governments of the world have started to put pressure on companies and individuals to reduce energy usage and become more environmentally friendly and sustainable. With some crafty rational and simple preparation, you can earn money and improve your business dramatically. 

Organizational Benefits of Coaching & Mentoring

by Nicole Long, Demand Media

Image result for coaching and mentoring

Coaching and mentoring can provide an array of benefits for organizations of all sizes, especially small businesses. 



When conducted in an efficient and productive manner, coaching and mentoring provides employees a way to connect, learn and grow within the company and along their own career paths.

Significance
Coaching and mentoring involve pairing experienced professionals with employees that could use help adapting to the environment and culture of the workplace. This can include pairing a mentor with new employees to help them settle into the surroundings and get off to a good start. Coaching often comes in play when a new employee or current employee can benefit from personal guidance on specific job duties, processes or responsibilities. Small businesses can also use mentors to help develop other employees along a specific career path, such as management.

Retention
On an organizational level, coaching and mentoring can provide a host of benefits. Mentoring and coaching can help encourage loyalty to the company. When experienced professionals help mold the career of and provide opportunities for mentees, these individuals may feel a greater sense of connection and commitment to the business. Coaching helps an employee feel comfortable with management and encourages open communication, resulting in a positive work experience. This can allow the company to save money that would have otherwise been spent on the continual recruitment and training of replacement employees. 

Personal Development
Taking advantage of the expertise and knowledge of experienced employees and professionals can help bring younger or less experienced employees up to speed. This results in better efficiency across the organization when bringing on new employees. In addition, coaching and mentoring can help guide an employee along on her career path resulting in an employee well versed on company expectations. Coaching specifically allows individuals to resolve issues and concerns within the boundaries of a trusted and confidential relationship. This can help reduce frustrations on a personal level and improve the job satisfaction of the individual, providing a benefit for the organization.

Team Efficiency

On top of developing employees, coaching and mentoring can improve the function of the team, department and entire organization. Coaching and mentoring allows managers to identify the weaknesses and strengths of each employee. This allows the organization to capitalize on the resources at hand to keep the whole team working smoothly when employees request vacation or take a sick day.

The Good, the Bad, and the Leaky Bucket of Digital Marketing

It's easy to make excuses for being a bad digital marketer - here are some ways you can turn that around and be a good one.


Image result for digital marketing imagesIn his book The Hard Thing About Hard Things, Ben Horowitz writes about good product managers and bad product managers. Apart from the fact that this is an excellent read for tech entrepreneurs, I’d like to use this notion to describe to you what, from my perspective, makes a good digital marketer and what makes a bad one.

Good Digital Marketers and Bad Digital Marketers

Good digital marketers know the market, the products, the product line, and the competition extremely well and operate from a strong basis of knowledge and confidence; they are the chiefs of marketing. A good digital marketer takes full responsibility and measures themselves in terms of the success of the customer engagement, and revenue generated, using data against set KPIs.

A good digital marketer knows the context going in (the company, revenue funding, competition, etc.), and they take responsibility for devising and executing a winning plan (no excuses!).

Image result for digital marketing images
Furthermore, they know the technologies available to them, trends in the digital sphere, how to apply a clear strategy across the digital channels available to them, and most importantly, use smart investment of their budget to both acquire and retain their clients, because they know very well how much revenue their newly acquired clients generate and how much their existing clients generate.

They will know their customers, what they buy, and what they want. Oh yes, and the good ones will also know the profit margins on the revenue driven from new and existing clients.

To do this, they will drive a contextualized messaging strategy. They know how they want their clients reviewing them and are team players.

There are many more attributes, but I think you’ve got the point: It’s hard.

Bad digital marketers?

Well, bad digital marketers have lots of excuses. Not enough marketing budgets, the IT manager is an idiot, the competitor has 10 times more people in the marketing team, I'm overworked, I don't get enough direction, the selling prices are too high and it’s not in my control, the website is too slow, we do not render well on mobiles and have low conversion rates, targets are fine but it is not my responsibility to be in charge of revenue…

Finally they don’t know their clients, or their competition.

Bad digital marketers think that all their revenue should come from the acquisition of new clients, because hey – that’s the easiest way to spend money and show some results.

They send the same message to all clients and do not personalize the customer journey.
The Leaky Bucket
In essence, bad digital marketers have a leaky bucket of revenue. They funnel in revenue from newly acquired customers in order to fill the bucket while spending tons of money on acquisition, but their problem is that they are doing a lousy job in retaining actual customers, who just hop on to competitors. So the revenue keeps gushing out of the bucket and they need to spend more money on acquisition just to refill to the same level.

What would you do to increase the revenues in the bucket? I bet the first thing you’d do is try to close the holes in the bucket with more spend on retention, and once this is done you’ll spend more money on acquisition – because you are a good digital marketer!

X-Raying Clients’ Revenue

Image result for digital marketing imagesHere are two theoretical examples of "x-raying" revenue from end consumers and attributing them to first-time purchase, second-time, and loyal clients.

In the graph below you’ll see that on average about 75 percent of the purchases are coming from first-time buyers (pink), and the very low percentage comes from repeat buyers – with time, the loyal customer base is growing, but it looks like this marketer isn’t investing enough time and focus on changing the proportions.
The pink layer will be very expensive revenue.

On the other hand you’ll see that in the second chart, in the beginning a lot of the revenues came from newly acquired clients but with time, their marketers made sure that the bucket was watertight. The holes were closed, revenue from existing clients is ever increasing, and at the same time smart dollars are invested into acquisition of new clients.

Now which one of the businesses has a good digital marketer?

Until next time.

6 Tips for Making Better Decisions

By Mike Myatt

Image result for making decisions

The one thing everyone on the planet has in common is the undeniable fact we’ve all made our fair share of regrettable decisions. 



Show me someone who hasn’t made a bad decision and I’ll show you someone who is either not being honest, or someone who avoids decisioning at all costs. Making sound decisions is a skill set that needs to be developed like any other. As a person who works with CEOs on a daily basis, I can tell you with great certainty all leaders are not created equal when it comes to the competency of their decisioning skills. Nothing will test your leadership mettle more than your ability to make decisions.


Why do leaders fail? They make poor choices that lead to bad decisions. And in some cases they compound bad decision upon bad decision. You cannot separate leadership from decisioning, for like it or not, they are inexorably linked. Put simply, the outcome of a leader’s choices and decisions can, and usually will, make or break them. The fact of the matter is that senior executives who rise to the C-suite do so largely based upon their ability to consistently make sound decisions. What most fail to realize is while it may take years of solid decision making to reach the boardroom, it often times only takes one bad decision to fall from the ivory tower. As much as you may wish it wasn’t so, when it comes to being a leader you’re really only as good as your last decision.


Here’s the thing – even leaders who don’t fail make bad decisions from time-to-time. When I reflect back upon the poor decisions I’ve made, it’s not that I wasn’t capable of making the correct decision, but for whatever reason I failed to use sound decisioning methodology. Gut instincts can only take you so far in life, and anyone who operates outside of a sound decisioning framework will eventually fall prey to an act of oversight, misinformation, misunderstanding, manipulation, impulsivity or some other negative influencing factor.

Image result for making decisionsThe first key in understanding how to make great decisions is learning how to synthesize the overwhelming amount incoming information leaders must deal with on a daily basis, while making the best decisions possible in a timely fashion. The key to dealing with the voluminous amounts of information is as simple as becoming discerning surrounding the filtering of various inputs.

Understanding that a hierarchy of knowledge exists is critically important when attempting to make prudent decisions. News Flash – not all inputs should weigh equally in one’s decisioning process. By developing a qualitative and quantitative filtering mechanism for your decisioning process you can make better decisions in a shorter period of time. The hierarchy of knowledge is as follows:

Gut Instincts: This is an experiential and/or emotional filter that may often times have no current underpinning of hard analytical support. That said, in absence of other decisioning filters it can sometimes be all a person has to go on when making a decision. Even when more refined analytics are available, your instincts can often provide a very valuable gut check against the reasonability or bias of other inputs. The big take away here is that intuitive decisioning can be refined and improved. My advice is to actually work at becoming very discerning.
Data: Raw data is comprised of disparate facts, statistics, or random inputs that in-and-of-themselves hold little value. Making conclusions based on data in its raw form will lead to flawed decisions based on incomplete data sets.

Information: Information is simply an evolved, or more complete data set. Information is therefore derived from a collection of processed data where context and meaning have been added to disparate facts which allow for a more thorough analysis.

Knowledge: Knowledge is information that has been refined by analysis such that it has been assimilated, tested and/or validated. Most importantly, knowledge is actionable with a high degree of accuracy because proof of concept exists.

Image result for making decisionsEven though people often treat theory and opinion as fact, they are not one and the same. I have witnessed many a savvy executive blur the lines between fact and fiction resulting in an ill advised decision when decisions are made under extreme pressure and outside of a sound decisioning framework. Decisions made at the gut instinct or data level can be made quickly, but offer a higher level of risk. Decisioning at the information level affords a higher degree of risk management, but are still not as safe as those decisions based upon actionable knowledge.

Another aspect that needs to be factored into the decisioning process is the source of the input. I believe it was Cyrus the Great who said “diversity in counsel, unity in command” meaning that good leaders seek the counsel of others, but maintain control over the final decision. While most successful leaders subscribe to this theory, the real question in not whether you should seek counsel, but in fact where, and how much counsel you should seek. You see more input, or the wrong input, doesn’t necessarily add value to a decisioning process. Volume for the sake of volume will only tend to confuse matters, and seeking input from sources that can’t offer significant contributions is likely a waste of time. Two other issues that should be considered in your decisioning process as they relate to the source of input are as follows:

Credibility: What is the track record of your source? Is the source reliable and credible? Are they delivering data, information or knowledge? Will the source tell you what you want to hear, what they want you to hear, or will they provide the unedited version of cold hard truth?
Bias: Are there any hidden and/or competing agendas that are coloring the input being received? Is the input being provided for the benefit of the source or the benefit of the enterprise?
The complexity of the current business landscape, combined with ever increasing expectations of performance, and the speed at which decisions must be made, are a potential recipe for disaster for today’s executive unless a defined methodology for decisioning is put into place. If you incorporate the following metrics into your decisioning framework you will minimize the chances of making a bad decision:

Perform a Situation Analysis: What is motivating the need for a decision? What would happen if no decision is made? Who will the decision impact (both directly and indirectly)? What data, analytics, research, or supporting information do you have to validate the inclinations driving your decision?
Subject your Decision to Public Scrutiny: There are no private decisions. Sooner or later the details surrounding any decision will likely come out. If your decision were printed on the front page of the newspaper how would you feel? What would your family think of your decision? How would your shareholders and employees feel about your decision? Have you sought counsel and/or feedback before making your decision?

Image result for making decisions
Conduct a Cost/Benefit Analysis: Do the potential benefits derived from the decision justify the expected costs? What if the costs exceed projections, and the benefits fall short of projections?

Assess the Risk/Reward Ratio: What are all the possible rewards, and when contrasted with all the potential risks are the odds in your favor, or are they stacked against you?

Assess Whether it is the Right Thing To Do: Standing behind decisions that everyone supports doesn’t particularly require a lot of chutzpah. On the other hand, standing behind what one believes is the right decision in the face of tremendous controversy is the stuff great leaders are made of. My wife has always told me that “you can’t go wrong by going right,” and as usual, I find her advice to be spot on. There are many areas where compromise yields significant benefits, but your value system, your character, or your integrity should never be compromised.

Make The Decision: Perhaps most importantly, you must have a bias toward action, and be willing to make the decision. Moreover, you must learn to make the best decision possible even if you possess an incomplete data set. Don’t fall prey to analysis paralysis, but rather make the best decision possible with the information at hand using some of the methods mentioned above. Opportunities and not static, and the law of diminishing returns applies to most opportunities in that the longer you wait to seize the opportunity the smaller the return typically is. In fact, more likely is the case that the opportunity will completely evaporate if you wait too long to seize it.

Bonus - Always have a back-up plan: The real test of a leader is what happens in the moments following the realization they’ve made the wrong decision. Great leaders understand all plans are made up of both constants and variables, and that sometimes the variables work against you. Smart leaders always have a contingency plan knowing circumstances can sometimes fall beyond the boundaries of reason or control – no “Plan B” equals a